Description: http://www.ptnowire.com/erp_files/image003.png

Pearson Technologies Site Map

HOME 

Training        Technical Services          Benefits        Satisfied Clients       Free Resources

 

Gallery           Training Products            Contact            Experience               

 

 

36 Years Of Superior Fiber Optic Services And Products

 

 

 

Legal Case History

 

Eric R. Pearson, CFOS/C/S/T/I

 

Attorney Or Client, Case, Type

Tribler Orpett & Meyer, P.C., cable damage and loss of use

Foley & Lardner LLP, patent interference consultation, written opinion and deposition

Merchant and Gould, patent consultation

BICC Vs. FOCAS, patent lawsuit, written opinion and deposition

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, ADC Vs. Panduit, patent lawsuit -- written opinion and deposition

Andereck, Evans, Milne, Peace & Johnson, LLC, Shomee Vs. Remee,  product liability and damages -- written opinion and deposition

Provo City Power, installation and product liability

Fibertection, product liability

Doyle Law Group, Haydon Vs. Sprint, loss of use and repair costs -- written opinion and deposition; underground cable system damage

Dell Moser, Verizon Vs. Bear, damage issues -- written opinion and deposition

Warzecha, Right of Way Broadband Vs. Port Blakely Communities, installation and technical contract issues -- written opinion and deposition

McKool Smith, Charter Communications Vs. TXU Electric, cable damage

Fee Smith, FiberLight vs. Austin Industries, damage and loss of use lawsuit -- written opinion and deposition; underground cable system damage

Fee Smith, Verizon Vs. Tiseo, damage and loss of use lawsuit -- written opinion and deposition; underground cable system damage

Two lawsuits, TX, responsibility for cable damage during installation with a Figure 8 machine, 1990Ős, product liability

Two insurance company consultations or declarations and depositions

16 June 2016